|
Monday, May 1, 2006, 06:59 AM - meta, feedbackloop
Man in an elaborate woman costume, Jokestress has decided all that discussion prior to her reading this site was wrong, and has decided to go ahead and edit the Xeni Jardin page herself.I looked at the xenisucks.com site and was pretty underwhelmed by the quality of the content. Further, the site really doesn't seem to be that notable. Alexa has it at 270,000th or something like that. The "criticism" is basically one tepid potshot for each BoingBoing post made by this article's subject. If you are going to rant on someone for their "lameness," your rants better not be lame in comparison.
Or what? You'll edit the Wikipedia page? OH NOES!!!1111 LOL DONGS.
Three words, "Jokestress": NEW YORK TIMES.
|
|
Monday, March 19, 2007, 11:00 PM
JOIN US & BECOME A CYBER SLEUTHAndrea James Transitioned Just To Hide From The Law
Hi, I would like to introduce myself. My name is Andrea James and I'm a transgender activist. You may not have heard of me because you see; I have no legitimate claim to fame other than the fact that I am currently in a relationship with a person named Calpernia Addams. Well that’s what other folks say.
On the other hand if you find the rock that Andrea lives under you will realize our TG activist has a criminal past of which she has gone to a great amount of time to hide. The BS that Andrea James real name before transitioning was James Meed is a triple whopper with cheese and no fries is lie. So you will know if you find Andrea James real first, middle and last name you will have more than 15 minutes of fame.
Andrea James is a borderline "Sexual Chameleon" with serious issues and crimes there are more people on "Her" trail than one can imagine. So you will know in the "TG Community" its psychos like James who cause more damage to honest TG'S reputation by extortion, blackmail and outlandish crimes against her own community. We hope who ever she has burned this time allot of luck and hope you can flush this one out and down the crapper by exposing the real before name and criminal record before this one became Andrea James. Andrea James use of the alias James Meed of Crawford Indiana is a hoax meant to throw people off “Her” track however we warn you beware of this clever sociopath. If you find Andrea James real name before "Her" transition you will most likely find this one on America's Most Wanted or wanted poster at the Post Office for a serious crimes because Andrea James transitioned out, just to hide from the law.
It's known that Andrea James assumed another persons identity that so far cannot be found or traced. So to all of you on the net you can become a "Cyber Sleuth" in space and join our secret society and quest to expose the lying hoax known as James Meed AKA Andrea James AKA Jokestress. Other tips and items “She” uses altered photographs to hide “Her” real face and to this day no can find “Her: physical address or a to trace her past.
"Cyber Sleuth 142"
|
|
Tuesday, May 2, 2006, 06:41 AM
I spent much of my youth cross-dressing. I stopped when I realized that there is nothing uglier than old cross-dressers. This qualifies me as an expert on transvestism, which allows me to say that blogging about crappy 'journalists' is a far better passtime than selling out your own kind by helping to make a movie about a supposed male transsexual that is actually played by a woman.
|
|
Monday, May 1, 2006, 08:23 PM
Attention Hork Infidel: I have plenty of other targets. I just don't pimp them here, as doing so would be tantamount to becoming that which I mock here by pimping my own creative outlets on an outlet which has nothing to do with the subject matter. I'd post links to them now, but, again, that'd just be becoming the thing I mock.I prefer a Steve Albini-esque "better to wallow obscurity than to pimp one's self" methodology. Maybe that's the Midwesterner in me.
|
|
Monday, May 1, 2006, 03:50 PM
: Nobody's forcing you to read boingboing or anything xeni jardin writes either, for that matter.Well, I don't: I prefer to get that stuff from here ;) I agree that the quality ain't what it was, and there seems to be a (mistaken, I think) assumption that we're all going to go along with the political sentiment of recent postings. Yes, they're not as funny as they were, but most things end up running downhill eventually.
However, it has been a real education watching Xeni's blog-buddies getting their knickers in such a twist about this site. The utter shite posted by Violent Blue, Kathryn Cramer, Jason Calacanis, Jokester (except at least her wikipedia entries are a bit more intelligent and focused than some) is an eye-opener. If they had ignored this site, it would never have gone anywhere. As it is, they've made it worth reading not necessarily for the humour, but just to see how the ripples spread out in cyberspace.
As for Xeni, I doubt she'll go away, maybe she'll prosper. I don't think, though, that this site is an attempt to drag her down, it's just a "propernoun-sucks.com" site in the best traditions of the net. She should look on it as a back-handed compliment and tell her friends to lay off.
|
|
Monday, May 1, 2006, 03:17 PM
>> It's a *joke*, people. Love it or leave it, nobody is forcing you to read it.Nobody's forcing you to read boingboing or anything xeni jardin writes either, for that matter. So what's the point?
Parody? Hmmm... maybe. But I gotta tell you, it almost seems forced now. I don't agree with the violent blues of the world, but it just comes off as unfunny, angry, and, well, a little pathetic at this point.
I mean, there's no denying I've chuckled at the content here, but the humor quotient has dropped precipitously since the first week or so. I mean, we get the point.
If the idea is to needle and poke Xeni Jardin into submission, to somehow ridicule/debunk/expose her until she magically disappears, disgraced, into the dustbin of intarweb history... well... I'm not sure it's necessary, or even worth the effort. People eventually wise up to crap, whether it's pointed out to them or not. Marketplace of ideas, doncha know.
The web is a cornucopia-o-crap. There's really no limit to the targets Matt Sharp could've chosen. I think it's time for him to branch out a bit.
|
|
Monday, May 1, 2006, 01:12 PM
Going out on a limb here, Uhh, but the NYT reference might have been tongue-in-cheek.
|
|
Monday, May 1, 2006, 10:44 AM
It's just a non-stop bunch of editing here. Jokestress is particularly amusing. Answering the call to "add to the article if you think it's too short" as a means to gain some kind of wiki-street cred so the "hate site" comment looks NPOV. Except for the whole use of "hate site"...it kind of betrays your motive.
And you know what, I hate to beat the proverbial dead horse here, but why is it with people of this uber lefty persuasion always consider everything that disagrees with them "hate"?
(It's a scary world for a free thinker, everybody hates what I think!)
|
|
Monday, May 1, 2006, 10:09 AM
This is just too good to be true. The tranny brigade comes to the rescue.
|
|
Monday, May 1, 2006, 09:38 AM
: "social networking" software system Duh, don't you mean "social networking mashup" or something?
"You're a grown man who spends a pretty fair chunk of his life writing a blog about how much you hate another blog. It's a sign that something is wrong with you. That you are emotionally stunted. See?"
I don't see. Perhaps you could explain it better? Does a blog have to have some kind of cosmic significance, is it meant to be "meaningful"? Are you retarded because you think this blog is important enought to waste *your* time on?
I could go on, but I suspect I already have. The irony is, I (and I suspect most other people who visit here) would never have found the site if Ms Lame hadn't posted it on boingboing herself. Bet she's kicking herself with her shiny, high-heel, GPS-enabled shoes ;)
It's a *joke*, people. Love it or leave it, nobody is forcing you to read it.
|
|
Monday, May 1, 2006, 09:38 AM
Making fun? I don't really think so. It is funny to me because the reporter at hand is a tool. The point is it was in the NEW YORK TIMES. The article itself was false information from Tidybowl a.k.a Violet Blue, but that still does not take away the fact that this was in the NEW YORK TIMES.Nice try, Bill O'RLY spins much better than you
|
|
Monday, May 1, 2006, 08:45 AM
Yes, obviously, I should schedule some time to have my penis removed.
|
|
Monday, May 1, 2006, 08:41 AM
Does it occur to you that the NEW YORK TIMES only mentioned this site because of the apparent emotional retardation of its creator? It was making fun of you, dude. Is this not obvious to you? Do you really think of that blurb as validation, and not humiliation? You're a grown man who spends a pretty fair chunk of his life writing a blog about how much you hate another blog. It's a sign that something is wrong with you. That you are emotionally stunted. See?But please, keep mentioning the New York Times thing. It really does make you look a lot better.
|
|
Monday, May 1, 2006, 08:23 AM
Perhaps a complex "social networking" software system would provide what we need?
|
|
Monday, May 1, 2006, 08:12 AM
Holy shit. Transgender activist? Life truly is stranger than fiction. We need a hall of shame or a Xeni family tree or something to document all of these nutjobs.
|
|
We are sorry. New comments are not allowed after 30 days.
|

Calendar



